Head to head · Agents & automation · updated Oct 15, 2026
Lindy vs Langflow
Lindy scores 15 to Langflow's 15 on public evidence for AI workflow automation, and they rank #2 and #3 there. Both are free to start. Numbers below are the same public signals the ranking uses, recomputed nightly — nothing here is sponsored.
Lindy
No-code platform for AI employees that handle email, scheduling, CRM, and other business workflows.
+ Templates for sales and support agents work with Gmail, Slack, and HubSpot out of the box.
− Credit-based pricing is hard to forecast for always-on agents.
Langflow
Visual low-code builder for RAG and multi-agent flows, acquired by DataStax and now part of IBM.
+ Python-native components can be edited inline, so flows are not limited to built-in nodes.
− Several critical security vulnerabilities in 2025 made exposed instances risky.
Side by side
public evidence| Lindy | Langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence score / 100 | 15 | 15 |
| GitHub stars | closed source | 0 |
| Hacker News stories, 30d | 1 | 0 |
| Release-feed mentions, 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Last activity | – | – |
| Pricing | Free tier | Open source · Free self-hosted |
| Platforms | web | web, linux, mac, windows |
| Maker | Lindy | Langflow (IBM/DataStax) |
Which one?
Pick Lindy if
Templates for sales and support agents work with Gmail, Slack, and HubSpot out of the box.
Best for business users automating inbox and CRM tasks.
Pick Langflow if
- you want open source — self-host it, read it, fork it
- you need it on linux, mac, windows
Best for Python developers who want a visual canvas.