Head to head · Agents & automation · updated Oct 15, 2026
Make vs Lindy
Make scores 46 to Lindy's 15 on public evidence for AI workflow automation, and they rank #1 and #2 there. Both are free to start. Numbers below are the same public signals the ranking uses, recomputed nightly — nothing here is sponsored.
Make
Visual automation platform with branching scenarios, AI agents, and detailed data mapping.
+ Visual scenario canvas handles complex branching and iteration better than Zapier.
− Operations-based billing and error handling confuse newcomers.
Lindy
No-code platform for AI employees that handle email, scheduling, CRM, and other business workflows.
+ Templates for sales and support agents work with Gmail, Slack, and HubSpot out of the box.
− Credit-based pricing is hard to forecast for always-on agents.
Side by side
public evidence| Make | Lindy | |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence score / 100 | 46 | 15 |
| GitHub stars | closed source | closed source |
| Hacker News stories, 30d | 7 | 1 |
| Release-feed mentions, 30d | 6 | 0 |
| Last activity | 0 days ago | – |
| Pricing | Free tier · Core from $9/mo | Free tier |
| Platforms | web | web |
| Maker | Make (Celonis) | Lindy |
Which one?
Pick Make if
- you want the stronger public evidence (46 vs 15)
Best for power users building complex multi-step automations.
Pick Lindy if
Templates for sales and support agents work with Gmail, Slack, and HubSpot out of the box.
Best for business users automating inbox and CRM tasks.