AI Use Cases

Head to head · Images · updated Oct 18, 2026

Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) vs Fooocus

Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) scores 68 to Fooocus's 68 on public evidence for generate images from text, and they rank #2 and #3 there. Both are free to start. Numbers below are the same public signals the ranking uses, recomputed nightly — nothing here is sponsored.

Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111)

The classic self-hosted browser UI for running Stable Diffusion models locally with extensions like ControlNet.

+ Huge extension ecosystem and years of tutorials make almost any workflow achievable locally.
− Development has slowed, newer models like Flux need forks (Forge), and setup is fiddly for non-technical users.

68▼ 9
evidence / 100

Open Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) ↗

Fooocus

Simplified offline Stable Diffusion XL app that hides sampler settings behind a Midjourney-style prompt box.

+ Produces good SDXL results with zero tuning, making it the easiest local generator to start with.
− In maintenance mode and tied to SDXL, so it does not support newer models like Flux.

68▲ 11
evidence / 100

Open Fooocus ↗

Side by side

public evidence
Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111)Fooocus
Evidence score / 1006868
GitHub stars165,07453,585
Hacker News stories, 30d00
Release-feed mentions, 30d00
Last activity230 days ago320 days ago
PricingOpen source · free; needs your own GPUOpen source · free
Platformswindows, mac, linuxwindows, linux
MakerAUTOMATIC1111 (community)lllyasviel

Which one?

Pick Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) if

  • you need it on mac
  • a bigger GitHub community matters (165,074 vs 53,585 stars)

Best for local SD 1.5 / SDXL generation.

Pick Fooocus if

Produces good SDXL results with zero tuning, making it the easiest local generator to start with.

Best for beginners wanting local SDXL.

Where they compete

More comparisons