AI Use Cases

Head to head · Images · updated Oct 15, 2026

Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) vs ComfyUI

Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) scores 59 to ComfyUI's 47 on public evidence for generate images from text, and they rank #1 and #2 there. Both are free to start. Numbers below are the same public signals the ranking uses, recomputed nightly — nothing here is sponsored.

Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111)

The classic self-hosted browser UI for running Stable Diffusion models locally with extensions like ControlNet.

+ Huge extension ecosystem and years of tutorials make almost any workflow achievable locally.
− Development has slowed, newer models like Flux need forks (Forge), and setup is fiddly for non-technical users.

59▲ 24
evidence / 100

Open Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) ↗

ComfyUI

Node-based open-source interface for building image, video and audio generation pipelines locally.

+ Gets day-one support for new open models (Flux, Wan, Hunyuan) and lets you wire up any pipeline you can imagine.
− The node graph has a steep learning curve and shared workflows frequently break on missing custom nodes.

47▼ 17
evidence / 100

Open ComfyUI ↗

Side by side

public evidence
Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111)ComfyUI
Evidence score / 1005947
GitHub stars165,0570
Hacker News stories, 30d04
Release-feed mentions, 30d03
Last activity227 days ago0 days ago
PricingOpen source · free; needs your own GPUOpen source · free; needs your own GPU
Platformswindows, mac, linuxwindows, mac, linux
MakerAUTOMATIC1111 (community)Comfy Org

Which one?

Pick Stable Diffusion WebUI (AUTOMATIC1111) if

  • you want the stronger public evidence (59 vs 47)
  • a bigger GitHub community matters (165,057 vs 0 stars)

Best for local SD 1.5 / SDXL generation.

Pick ComfyUI if

  • you want active maintenance (0 days since last activity vs 227)

Best for power users running open models locally.

Where they compete

More comparisons