AI Use Cases

Head to head · Chat & research · updated Oct 25, 2026

ChatGPT vs Consensus

ChatGPT scores 79 to Consensus's 47 on public evidence for deep research & AI search, and they rank #1 and #4 there. Both are free to start. Numbers below are the same public signals the ranking uses, recomputed nightly — nothing here is sponsored.

ChatGPT

OpenAI's general-purpose chat assistant with web browsing, file analysis, image generation and voice.

+ The broadest feature set in one place: Deep Research, code-executing data analysis on uploaded spreadsheets, voice mode and a huge library of custom GPTs.
− Free and Plus tiers hit message caps on the best models at busy times, and answers can be confidently wrong without citations unless you ask it to search.

79—
evidence / 100

Open ChatGPT ↗

Consensus

A search engine over peer-reviewed papers that summarizes what the research says and shows a yes/no/possibly meter.

+ The Consensus Meter gives an at-a-glance split of studies supporting or opposing a claim, with each paper linked.
− Only indexes academic literature, so it is useless for questions the scientific record does not cover, and paper summaries can oversimplify findings.

47—
evidence / 100

Open Consensus ↗

Side by side

public evidence
ChatGPTConsensus
Evidence score / 1007947
GitHub starsclosed sourceclosed source
Hacker News stories, 30d22411
Release-feed mentions, 30d723
Last activity0 days ago7 days ago
PricingFree tier · Plus $20/mo, Pro $200/moFree tier · Premium from $8.99/mo
Platformsweb, mac, windows, ios, android, apiweb
MakerOpenAIConsensus

Which one?

Pick ChatGPT if

  • you want the stronger public evidence (79 vs 47)
  • you need it on android, api, ios

Best for an all-round first assistant to try.

Pick Consensus if

The Consensus Meter gives an at-a-glance split of studies supporting or opposing a claim, with each paper linked.

Best for checking what studies say about a claim.

Where they compete

More comparisons