Head to head · Coding · updated Oct 15, 2026
Stitch vs Anima
Stitch scores 40 to Anima's 32 on public evidence for screenshot / design to code, and they rank #1 and #3 there. Both are free to start. Numbers below are the same public signals the ranking uses, recomputed nightly — nothing here is sponsored.
Stitch
Google Labs tool that generates UI designs and front-end code from text prompts or sketches.
+ Produces editable designs you can paste into Figma as well as HTML/CSS.
− Experimental Labs product with generation caps and limited iteration.
Anima
Converts Figma designs into React, Vue, or HTML code and now offers an AI design-to-app playground.
+ Long-standing Figma plugin that respects auto-layout and produces responsive code.
− Generated components still need cleanup before they are production-ready.
Side by side
public evidence| Stitch | Anima | |
|---|---|---|
| Evidence score / 100 | 40 | 32 |
| GitHub stars | closed source | closed source |
| Hacker News stories, 30d | 4 | 1 |
| Release-feed mentions, 30d | 1 | 1 |
| Last activity | 0 days ago | 0 days ago |
| Pricing | Free with monthly generation limits | Free tier |
| Platforms | web | web |
| Maker | Anima |
Which one?
Pick Stitch if
- you want the stronger public evidence (40 vs 32)
Best for quick UI mockups from a sketch or prompt.
Pick Anima if
Long-standing Figma plugin that respects auto-layout and produces responsive code.
Best for front-end teams converting Figma files.