Coding · 17 tools · updated Oct 15, 2026
Which framework should I use to build my own agent?
smolagents leads with an evidence score of 67/100, ahead of Vercel AI SDK (66) and Goose (35). 17 of 17 can be used free, 16 are open source. Best for lightweight agents with open models: smolagents.
Ranked by evidence — GitHub stars, Hacker News mentions, release activity and how much you can use for free. Recomputed nightly. How the score works.
+ Code-as-action agents in about a thousand lines of core code that work with any Hub model.
− Running model-written Python needs sandboxing, which is left mostly to you.
+ Unified provider interface and React hooks make streaming chat UIs trivial.
− Major-version upgrades have required significant rewrites.
+ MCP-first design means any MCP server becomes a Goose capability with no glue code.
− Less tuned for coding than Claude Code, so results vary widely by model.
+ Explicit state graphs with checkpointing make long-running agents debuggable and resumable.
− Steep learning curve and more boilerplate than simpler agent SDKs.
+ Largest integration catalogue of any framework, so almost any provider is one import away.
− Frequent breaking API changes and heavy abstractions make simple things feel over-engineered.
+ Inherits Claude Code's file, shell, and subagent tooling, so agents are production-grade on day one.
− Tied to Claude models and the Claude Code runtime rather than a provider-agnostic design.
+ Best-in-class document loaders, indexes, and LlamaParse for messy PDFs.
− Agent features are secondary to retrieval and the package surface is sprawling.
+ Role, goal, and task abstractions make multi-agent setups readable in a few lines.
− Agents can loop or burn tokens unpredictably with little low-level control.
+ Templates for sales and support agents work with Gmail, Slack, and HubSpot out of the box.
− Credit-based pricing is hard to forecast for always-on agents.
+ Python-native components can be edited inline, so flows are not limited to built-in nodes.
− Several critical security vulnerabilities in 2025 made exposed instances risky.
+ AutoGen Studio offers a no-code UI for prototyping agent teams.
− The v0.4 rewrite broke compatibility and the AG2 fork split the community.
+ Covers prompt management, knowledge bases, and deployable APIs in one self-hostable app.
− Complex workflows get unwieldy in the visual canvas and version control is weak.
+ Fastest way to prototype a LangChain chatbot and expose it as an API or embed widget.
− Inherits LangChain's churn and breaks when node versions drift.
+ First-class deployment to Vertex AI Agent Engine and support for the A2A protocol.
− Documentation and examples skew heavily to Google Cloud.
+ Batteries-included TypeScript stack with a local dev playground for inspecting agent runs.
− Newer and smaller than LangChain, with APIs still shifting.
+ Handoffs and built-in tracing are simple to reason about and integrate with the OpenAI dashboard.
− Tuned for OpenAI models; other providers work but lose features.
+ Validated, typed outputs and a FastAPI-like developer experience with minimal magic.
− Younger ecosystem with fewer integrations than LangChain.
Head to head: smolagents vs Vercel AI SDK smolagents vs Goose Vercel AI SDK vs Goose
Missing a tool? It gets added when it shows up in the release feed with real traction, not by request.